ECTRIMS eLearning

Daclizumab: side effects and efficacy in a real world setting
Author(s): ,
S. Raunegger
Affiliations:
Jewish Hospital Berlin | Neurology, Jewish Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
J. Haas
Affiliations:
Jewish Hospital Berlin | Neurology, Jewish Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
ECTRIMS Learn. Raunegger S. 10/10/18; 229494; EP1657
Sandra Raunegger
Sandra Raunegger
Contributions
Abstract

Abstract: EP1657

Type: Poster Sessions

Abstract Category: Therapy - Risk management for disease modifying treatments

Background: After European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval Daclizumab (DAC) had been available in Germany for relapsing remitting Multiple sclerosis since August 2016. We started the medication in 53 patients. Due to safety concerns, we discontinued all patients in November 2017.
Objective: An evaluation of 53 patients treated with DAC concerning side effects and efficacy.
Methods: We analysed data of 53 patients (MDOC database) regarding side effects and efficacy of Daclizumab.
Results: 53 patients (10 male, 43 female) were included, mean age 39.6 years, mean EDSS 3.2.
The most and long lasting side effects were skin reactions in nine patients, in two still severely present one year after stop, recovering after Cladribine within 4 weeks. Two autoimmune hepatitis so far showed no recovery, two elevation of liver enzymes normalized. Three inflammatory bowel disease, one iritis, one tenosynovitis, three excessive lymphnode swellings occurred and a life threatening eosinophilic meningoencephalitis, proven by brain biopsy. To our knowledge at that time no similar cases had been reported. One cholangiocellular carcinoma occurred.
All patients had MS activity before start of DAC, on therapy 13 out of 15 had MRI activity and six relapsed.
Conclusion: Compared to the SELECT and DECIDE data we observed more severe side effects than expected. There was no spontaneous recovery in autoimmune hepatitis and severe skin reactions. A life threatening meningoencephalitis made us stop DAC even before the drug was withdrawn from the market. The efficacy in our patients was less than expected: 36% with disease activity on therapy.
There is an unmet need for independent registries to collect in time real life data for safety.
Disclosure: J. Haas received compensation from Biogen, Bayer, Teva, Sanofi Aventis, Allergan, Genzyme, CSL Behring, Octapharma.
S. Raunegger has nothing to disclose

Abstract: EP1657

Type: Poster Sessions

Abstract Category: Therapy - Risk management for disease modifying treatments

Background: After European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval Daclizumab (DAC) had been available in Germany for relapsing remitting Multiple sclerosis since August 2016. We started the medication in 53 patients. Due to safety concerns, we discontinued all patients in November 2017.
Objective: An evaluation of 53 patients treated with DAC concerning side effects and efficacy.
Methods: We analysed data of 53 patients (MDOC database) regarding side effects and efficacy of Daclizumab.
Results: 53 patients (10 male, 43 female) were included, mean age 39.6 years, mean EDSS 3.2.
The most and long lasting side effects were skin reactions in nine patients, in two still severely present one year after stop, recovering after Cladribine within 4 weeks. Two autoimmune hepatitis so far showed no recovery, two elevation of liver enzymes normalized. Three inflammatory bowel disease, one iritis, one tenosynovitis, three excessive lymphnode swellings occurred and a life threatening eosinophilic meningoencephalitis, proven by brain biopsy. To our knowledge at that time no similar cases had been reported. One cholangiocellular carcinoma occurred.
All patients had MS activity before start of DAC, on therapy 13 out of 15 had MRI activity and six relapsed.
Conclusion: Compared to the SELECT and DECIDE data we observed more severe side effects than expected. There was no spontaneous recovery in autoimmune hepatitis and severe skin reactions. A life threatening meningoencephalitis made us stop DAC even before the drug was withdrawn from the market. The efficacy in our patients was less than expected: 36% with disease activity on therapy.
There is an unmet need for independent registries to collect in time real life data for safety.
Disclosure: J. Haas received compensation from Biogen, Bayer, Teva, Sanofi Aventis, Allergan, Genzyme, CSL Behring, Octapharma.
S. Raunegger has nothing to disclose

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies