ECTRIMS eLearning

A systematic literature review: the relation between cognitive functioning and work outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis
Author(s): ,
D.A.M. van Gorp
Affiliations:
University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht; Leiden University, Leiden; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg
,
K. van der Hiele
Affiliations:
Leiden University, Leiden; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg; National Multiple Sclerosis Foundation, Rotterdam
,
H.A.M. Middelkoop
Affiliations:
Leiden University, Leiden; Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
L.H. Visser
Affiliations:
University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht; Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg
ECTRIMS Learn. van Gorp D. 10/10/18; 229383; EP1545
Dennis Adrianus Martinus van Gorp
Dennis Adrianus Martinus van Gorp
Contributions
Abstract

Abstract: EP1545

Type: Poster Sessions

Abstract Category: Pathology and pathogenesis of MS - Neuropsychology

Background: The majority of MS patients are unable to retain in the work force. Cognitive dysfunction is increasingly being recognized as an important limiting factor in work participation in patients with Multiple Sclerosis. This literature review provides a description, synthesis and interpretation of the existing literature and identifies gaps and caveats in current knowledge.
Methods: Clinical trials, randomized controlled trials or observational quantitative studies, published between 1970 and April 2017 in which data on cognitive factors associated with employment, work functioning or work-related problems were reported, were included. Papers were manually double checked by two blinded reviewers.
Results: A total of 41 papers were included of which 4 papers concerned prospective, longitudinal studies. The majority of studies reported positive associations between cognitive functioning and work outcomes (37/41 studies; 90%). Positive associations were found between work outcomes and global cognitive functioning (8/9 studies; 89%), language (8/17 studies; 47%), processing speed/ working memory (22/26 studies; 85%), new learning and memory (12/21 studies; 57%), executive functioning (10/16; 63%), intelligence (1/6; 17%) and self-reported cognitive functioning (14/15; 93%). None of the reviewed studies found a relation between visuospatial processing and work outcomes (0/8; 0%). Models including cognitive measures as well as demographic (age, education), neurological (disability, fine motor coordination, disease course), and psychological variables (depression, personality, fatigue) best predicted work outcomes.
Conclusion: By conducting this review we found ample evidence that objective cognitive functioning (specifically processing speed/ working memory and executive functioning) and self-reported cognitive functioning are important independent associates of work outcomes and should be addressed by healthcare professionals. Future research could benefit from a standardized categorization of cognitive tests and a focus on longitudinal changes in cognition and its relation to work outcomes.
Disclosure: D.A.M. van Gorp received honoraria for presentations from Sanofi Genzyme.
K. van der Hiele received honoraria for consultancies, presentations and advisory boards from Sanofi Genzyme and Merck Serono.
H. Middelkoop reports no competing interests.
L.H. Visser received honoraria for lectures, grants for research and honoraria for advisory boards from Sanofi Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis and Teva.

Abstract: EP1545

Type: Poster Sessions

Abstract Category: Pathology and pathogenesis of MS - Neuropsychology

Background: The majority of MS patients are unable to retain in the work force. Cognitive dysfunction is increasingly being recognized as an important limiting factor in work participation in patients with Multiple Sclerosis. This literature review provides a description, synthesis and interpretation of the existing literature and identifies gaps and caveats in current knowledge.
Methods: Clinical trials, randomized controlled trials or observational quantitative studies, published between 1970 and April 2017 in which data on cognitive factors associated with employment, work functioning or work-related problems were reported, were included. Papers were manually double checked by two blinded reviewers.
Results: A total of 41 papers were included of which 4 papers concerned prospective, longitudinal studies. The majority of studies reported positive associations between cognitive functioning and work outcomes (37/41 studies; 90%). Positive associations were found between work outcomes and global cognitive functioning (8/9 studies; 89%), language (8/17 studies; 47%), processing speed/ working memory (22/26 studies; 85%), new learning and memory (12/21 studies; 57%), executive functioning (10/16; 63%), intelligence (1/6; 17%) and self-reported cognitive functioning (14/15; 93%). None of the reviewed studies found a relation between visuospatial processing and work outcomes (0/8; 0%). Models including cognitive measures as well as demographic (age, education), neurological (disability, fine motor coordination, disease course), and psychological variables (depression, personality, fatigue) best predicted work outcomes.
Conclusion: By conducting this review we found ample evidence that objective cognitive functioning (specifically processing speed/ working memory and executive functioning) and self-reported cognitive functioning are important independent associates of work outcomes and should be addressed by healthcare professionals. Future research could benefit from a standardized categorization of cognitive tests and a focus on longitudinal changes in cognition and its relation to work outcomes.
Disclosure: D.A.M. van Gorp received honoraria for presentations from Sanofi Genzyme.
K. van der Hiele received honoraria for consultancies, presentations and advisory boards from Sanofi Genzyme and Merck Serono.
H. Middelkoop reports no competing interests.
L.H. Visser received honoraria for lectures, grants for research and honoraria for advisory boards from Sanofi Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis and Teva.

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies