ECTRIMS eLearning

Dimethyl fumarate treatment in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a prospective observational postmarketing study of effectiveness
Author(s): ,
Y. Aladro Benito
Affiliations:
Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe
,
M. Cerezo Garcia
Affiliations:
Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Getafe
,
S. Urtiaga
Affiliations:
Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Getafe
,
V. Galán Sánchez-Seco
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
,
I. Moreno Torres
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
,
J. Sabin Muñoz
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro
,
M. Gómez
Affiliations:
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor
,
I. Thuissard
Affiliations:
Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
,
D. Sanz
Affiliations:
Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
DMFCAM study group
DMFCAM study group
Affiliations:
ECTRIMS Learn. Aladro Benito Y. 10/10/18; 228485; P641
Yolanda Aladro Benito
Yolanda Aladro Benito
Contributions
Abstract

Abstract: P641

Type: Poster Sessions

Abstract Category: Therapy - Others

Background: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) efficacy in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) has been demonstrated in 2 randomized clinical trials (RCT), these outcomes could be influenced in clinical practice by factors controlled in RCT, such as comorbidities and disease duration. Post-marketing studies are needed to assess its effectiveness in a real clinical practice.
Objective: The aim of this observational, prospective, multicenter and post-marketing study was to evaluate DMF effectiveness in a real-world clinical setting.
Methods: RMS patients on DMF treatment and at least one year of follow-up were included. Three subgroups were considered: naïve, switching to DMF for suboptimal response (SR) and for adverse effects (EA). The main efficacy endpoints were annualized relapses rate (ARR) and number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions (T1gd). Secondary objectives included: proportion of patients without relapses, disability progression and new T2 lesions. Negative binomial regression was used for evaluating effect on relapses and T1gd lesions.
Results: A total 456 patients (70.6% women, aged 39.6±9.7, baseline EDSS 2.06±1.07, duration disease 8.9±7.5) completed 1 and 233 two years of follow-up. Twenty four percent belong to naïve, 46.7% to SR and 29,2% to EA subgroups. Comparing to prior year, at 12 months after DMF treatment, ARR was significant lower in total population (76.3%, 0.69 to 0.16 -95%CI:0.12-0.21-p=.000), SR (75%) and naïve (92%,1.06 to 0.09-95%CI:0.04-0.18-p=.000). T1gad lesions number was significantly reduced a 79% in total population and 92% in naïve. These rates were maintained at 24 months. Eighty-five percent and 89% of patients were free-relapses by 12 and 24 months on DMF, respectively. The 86% and 77.6% were free of disability progression, 80% and 86% of new T2 lesions, after 12 and 24 months on treatment.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that DMF may be an effective treatment option over the first two year in both RMS, naïve and those switching from other MS treatment.
Disclosure: The investigators do not have any conflict of interests to disclose

Abstract: P641

Type: Poster Sessions

Abstract Category: Therapy - Others

Background: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) efficacy in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) has been demonstrated in 2 randomized clinical trials (RCT), these outcomes could be influenced in clinical practice by factors controlled in RCT, such as comorbidities and disease duration. Post-marketing studies are needed to assess its effectiveness in a real clinical practice.
Objective: The aim of this observational, prospective, multicenter and post-marketing study was to evaluate DMF effectiveness in a real-world clinical setting.
Methods: RMS patients on DMF treatment and at least one year of follow-up were included. Three subgroups were considered: naïve, switching to DMF for suboptimal response (SR) and for adverse effects (EA). The main efficacy endpoints were annualized relapses rate (ARR) and number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions (T1gd). Secondary objectives included: proportion of patients without relapses, disability progression and new T2 lesions. Negative binomial regression was used for evaluating effect on relapses and T1gd lesions.
Results: A total 456 patients (70.6% women, aged 39.6±9.7, baseline EDSS 2.06±1.07, duration disease 8.9±7.5) completed 1 and 233 two years of follow-up. Twenty four percent belong to naïve, 46.7% to SR and 29,2% to EA subgroups. Comparing to prior year, at 12 months after DMF treatment, ARR was significant lower in total population (76.3%, 0.69 to 0.16 -95%CI:0.12-0.21-p=.000), SR (75%) and naïve (92%,1.06 to 0.09-95%CI:0.04-0.18-p=.000). T1gad lesions number was significantly reduced a 79% in total population and 92% in naïve. These rates were maintained at 24 months. Eighty-five percent and 89% of patients were free-relapses by 12 and 24 months on DMF, respectively. The 86% and 77.6% were free of disability progression, 80% and 86% of new T2 lesions, after 12 and 24 months on treatment.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that DMF may be an effective treatment option over the first two year in both RMS, naïve and those switching from other MS treatment.
Disclosure: The investigators do not have any conflict of interests to disclose

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies