ECTRIMS eLearning

Physical behavior is associated with physical fatigue in persons with multiple sclerosis related fatigue
Author(s): ,
J van Meeteren
Affiliations:
Rijndam, Location Erasmus MC
,
L.J.M Blikman
Affiliations:
Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
,
D Rizopoulos
Affiliations:
Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
,
V de Groot
Affiliations:
VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
H Beckerman
Affiliations:
VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
H.J Stam
Affiliations:
Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
,
H.B.J Bussmann
Affiliations:
Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
TREFAMS ACE Group
TREFAMS ACE Group
Affiliations:
ECTRIMS Learn. van Meeteren J. 09/15/16; 146629; P789
Jetty van Meeteren
Jetty van Meeteren
Contributions
Abstract

Abstract: P789

Type: Poster

Abstract Category: RIMS - Neuropsychology and fatigue management

Objective: To study associations between dimensions of physical behavior and dimensions of fatigue in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) related fatigue.

Design: cross-sectional analysis.

Setting: Outpatient rehabilitation departments. Physical behavior monitoring was conducted in participants´ daily environment.

Method:

Participants: 212 persons with MS from a multicenter RCT study. Persons with MS were severely fatigued, Fatigue Severity Scale median: 5.4 (4.8-5.9), and minimally to moderately neurological impaired, Expanded Disability Status Scale: 2.5 (2.0-3.5), 73.1% had Relapsing Remitting MS.

Interventions: not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures: Physical behavior was measured using an accelerometer and fatigue was measured by questionnaires (i.e., Checklist Individual Strength, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale). Fatigue questionnaires subscales and physical behavior outcomes were standardized and categorized in dimensions. For fatigue: subjective, physical, cognitive and psychological fatigue; for physical behavior:

activity amount, activity intensity, day pattern and distribution of activities.

Results: Physical behavior dimensions were significantly associated with only the physical fatigue dimension (omnibus F-test: 3.96, df1 = 4, df2 = 207, p = .004). Additional analysis showed that activity amount (B= -0.16, 95% CI = -0.27 to -0.04, p = .007), activity intensity (B= -0.18, 95% CI= -0.31 to -0.06, p= .004) and day pattern (B= -0.17, 95% CI = -0.28 to -0.06, p = .002) were the physical behavior dimensions that were significantly associated with physical fatigue. Age and gender did not confound these associations.

Conclusions: Physical behavior is weakly associated with physical fatigue and not with other fatigue dimensions, such as cognitive and psychological. This supports the notion that fatigue is multidimensional, and may imply that different treatment modalities should be considered in the treatment of fatigue.

Disclosure: Study is funded by Fonds NutsOhra and ZonMw

L.J.M Blikman: nothing to disclose

J. van Meeteren: nothing to disclose

D. Rizopoulos: nothing to disclose,

V. de Groot: nothing to disclose,

H. Beckerman: nothing to disclose,

H.J. Stam: nothing to disclose,

J.B.J. Bussmann: nothing to disclose

Abstract: P789

Type: Poster

Abstract Category: RIMS - Neuropsychology and fatigue management

Objective: To study associations between dimensions of physical behavior and dimensions of fatigue in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) related fatigue.

Design: cross-sectional analysis.

Setting: Outpatient rehabilitation departments. Physical behavior monitoring was conducted in participants´ daily environment.

Method:

Participants: 212 persons with MS from a multicenter RCT study. Persons with MS were severely fatigued, Fatigue Severity Scale median: 5.4 (4.8-5.9), and minimally to moderately neurological impaired, Expanded Disability Status Scale: 2.5 (2.0-3.5), 73.1% had Relapsing Remitting MS.

Interventions: not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures: Physical behavior was measured using an accelerometer and fatigue was measured by questionnaires (i.e., Checklist Individual Strength, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale). Fatigue questionnaires subscales and physical behavior outcomes were standardized and categorized in dimensions. For fatigue: subjective, physical, cognitive and psychological fatigue; for physical behavior:

activity amount, activity intensity, day pattern and distribution of activities.

Results: Physical behavior dimensions were significantly associated with only the physical fatigue dimension (omnibus F-test: 3.96, df1 = 4, df2 = 207, p = .004). Additional analysis showed that activity amount (B= -0.16, 95% CI = -0.27 to -0.04, p = .007), activity intensity (B= -0.18, 95% CI= -0.31 to -0.06, p= .004) and day pattern (B= -0.17, 95% CI = -0.28 to -0.06, p = .002) were the physical behavior dimensions that were significantly associated with physical fatigue. Age and gender did not confound these associations.

Conclusions: Physical behavior is weakly associated with physical fatigue and not with other fatigue dimensions, such as cognitive and psychological. This supports the notion that fatigue is multidimensional, and may imply that different treatment modalities should be considered in the treatment of fatigue.

Disclosure: Study is funded by Fonds NutsOhra and ZonMw

L.J.M Blikman: nothing to disclose

J. van Meeteren: nothing to disclose

D. Rizopoulos: nothing to disclose,

V. de Groot: nothing to disclose,

H. Beckerman: nothing to disclose,

H.J. Stam: nothing to disclose,

J.B.J. Bussmann: nothing to disclose

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies